|
Documentary
Titbits
Five snippets that give an inside view of the
Fermat's Last Theorem, the TV documentary.
The Historic
Photo The announcement of the
proof of Fermat's Last Theorem is a momentous event in the
documentary, but the problem was how to show it on screen.
Fortunately, one of the mathematicians who attended the
lecture when Andrew Wiles revealed his proof was sharp enough
to grab a historic photograph. Professor Peter Goddard caught
the moment in one of the most charming pictures in the history
of mathematics. You can see it at the Plus website.
Andrew Wiles - not a fan of
TV Professor Wiles, having
being overwhelmed by the press attention, was not looking
forward to the prospect of a TV documentary. One of the
most persuasive arguments was that this was a unique
opportunity to create something that would inspire a new
generation of mathematicians. Eventually he agreed to set
aside the time required, which turned out to be three days
of discussion prior to filming and five half days of filming.
I suspect that Andrew was anxious about what the final film
would look like, but in end he was delighted with the
documentary. And that has been one of the great outcomes -
the public enjoyed the programme, but mathematicians have
praised it as well.
Dark Mansion
Story "You enter the first room of the
mansion and it's completely dark. You stumble around bumping
into the furniture, but gradually you learn where each piece
of furniture is. Finally, after six months or so, you find the
light switch, you turn it on, and suddenly it's all
illuminated. You can see exactly where you were. Then you move
into the next room and spend another six months in the dark.
So each of these breakthroughs, while sometimes they're
momentary, sometimes over a period of a day or two, they are
the culmination of -- and couldn't exist without -- the many
months of stumbling around in the dark that precede them."
This is how Andrew Wiles describes the process of doing
mathematics. This was a crucial tale for the documentary
because it conjured up such strong imagery. The story appears
at the start of the documentary and the imagery returns later,
whenever Wiles is in trouble.
Non-Linear Editing When I started in
television in 1991, some people edited by cutting strips of
film. But I was part of the video generation. We would sit
surrounded by video tapes and take bits from each one, which
would all be recorded onto an output tape. The problem
was that once a sequence has been recorded, it was impossible
to insert anything without starting from scratch. By the time
we were making Fermat's Last Theorem, we were in the age of
digital editing or non-linear editing. Hundreds of film clips
were digitised and stored on a computer, and then they could
be manipulated just like text in a word processor. Non-linear
editing allows instantaneous cutting and pasting, which means
you can experiment much more than you could have done with
previous techniques. Some of the fast-cut montages would
probably not have occurred had the editing not made
experimentation so easy. Today, non-linear editing is
available on home PCs, and current home editing is probably on
a par with professional editing in the mid-1990s.
The Plot Twist The story of Andrew
Wiles and Fermat's Last Theorem is wonderful for many
reasons, and one of them is that is contains a major plot
twist. After seven years of secret research, Wiles announces
his proof. The mathematical community rejoices. Just when it
seems that the story has come to an end, everything falls
apart - there is a flaw in the proof. This is akin to typical
horror movie, whereby the hero slays the monster, and just as
he turns his back the monster comes back to life for one last
attack. Fortunately for Wiles, he slayed the monster at the
second attempt and emerged triumphant. From a director's point
of view, it is a huge bonus to have such a major plot twist
two thirds of the way through a documentary. I am glad that
the original proof was flawed. |
 Andrew Wiles's graduation - this is not the
historic
photograph. |